<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 366 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessable value of imported goods should consider all relevant expenses incurred by the importers, not just the selling prices. The lower authorities were found to have erred in solely relying on selling prices to determine the value. By accepting the breakdown of costs presented by the importers, the Tribunal set aside the previous decision and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the need to include all expenses in assessing the value of imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 11:13:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 366 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessable value of imported goods should consider all relevant expenses incurred by the importers, not just the selling prices. The lower authorities were found to have erred in solely relying on selling prices to determine the value. By accepting the breakdown of costs presented by the importers, the Tribunal set aside the previous decision and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the need to include all expenses in assessing the value of imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>