<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 355 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247428</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, admitted additional evidence, and directed fresh adjudication on the addition of Rs. 92,59,530 as unexplained cash credit. It ruled that no addition was warranted in reassessment proceedings under section 153C r/w section 153A, as the original assessment order did not abate. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes and on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 10:04:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 355 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247428</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, admitted additional evidence, and directed fresh adjudication on the addition of Rs. 92,59,530 as unexplained cash credit. It ruled that no addition was warranted in reassessment proceedings under section 153C r/w section 153A, as the original assessment order did not abate. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes and on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>