<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 353 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247426</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of commission expenses and the addition under section 69D based on loose papers, dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal in both aspects. The disallowance of commission expenses was upheld due to insufficient justification for the increase and lack of supporting evidence, while the addition under section 69D was affirmed as the transactions on loose papers were unaccounted for in the books and remained unexplained by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 10:04:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 353 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247426</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of commission expenses and the addition under section 69D based on loose papers, dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal in both aspects. The disallowance of commission expenses was upheld due to insufficient justification for the increase and lack of supporting evidence, while the addition under section 69D was affirmed as the transactions on loose papers were unaccounted for in the books and remained unexplained by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>