https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165136 Where disputes arising from the same contractual claims are already pending before a duly constituted arbitral tribunal, a second tribunal cannot be constituted for the same subject matter. Parallel arbitral proceedings over identical issues create a risk of conflicting awards and are without jurisdiction. The availability of objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not justify sustaining a second tribunal in these circumstances. Delay in objecting to an engineer's decision or the grant of extension of time does not alter the fact that the merits of the claims remain with the first tribunal. The operative effect is that only the earlier tribunal may continue with adjudication. en-us Mon, 26 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 May 2014 16:30:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165136 Where disputes arising from the same contractual claims are already pending before a duly constituted arbitral tribunal, a second tribunal cannot be constituted for the same subject matter. Parallel arbitral proceedings over identical issues create a risk of conflicting awards and are without jurisdiction. The availability of objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not justify sustaining a second tribunal in these circumstances. Delay in objecting to an engineer's decision or the grant of extension of time does not alter the fact that the merits of the claims remain with the first tribunal. The operative effect is that only the earlier tribunal may continue with adjudication. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 26 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165136