<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 898 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165132</link>
    <description>Acceptance of the final bill without protest or reservation, coupled with a contractual bar on further claims, was treated as waiver and extinguishment of any later demand; no live dispute survived to justify arbitration. Appointment of an arbitrator also had to conform to the parties&#039; clause requiring a serving engineering officer with the prescribed qualification, and a contrary appointment was not justified. The Section 11 power could be exercised only where an existing dispute was shown and the contractual mechanism for appointment was followed, so the order appointing a sole arbitrator was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 898 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165132</link>
      <description>Acceptance of the final bill without protest or reservation, coupled with a contractual bar on further claims, was treated as waiver and extinguishment of any later demand; no live dispute survived to justify arbitration. Appointment of an arbitrator also had to conform to the parties&#039; clause requiring a serving engineering officer with the prescribed qualification, and a contrary appointment was not justified. The Section 11 power could be exercised only where an existing dispute was shown and the contractual mechanism for appointment was followed, so the order appointing a sole arbitrator was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>