<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 339 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247412</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision on the taxability of services provided to railways under the erection, installation, and commissioning category. The Commissioner was directed to analyze the contracts to determine if the services were taxable, emphasizing compliance with legal precedents. The Tribunal did not address the penalty issue, instructing the Commissioner to first determine tax liability before quantifying tax demand and imposing penalties. Clear findings on the taxability of services under the contracts with railways were required before proceeding with penalty imposition, citing relevant legal precedents for guidance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2014 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 339 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247412</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision on the taxability of services provided to railways under the erection, installation, and commissioning category. The Commissioner was directed to analyze the contracts to determine if the services were taxable, emphasizing compliance with legal precedents. The Tribunal did not address the penalty issue, instructing the Commissioner to first determine tax liability before quantifying tax demand and imposing penalties. Clear findings on the taxability of services under the contracts with railways were required before proceeding with penalty imposition, citing relevant legal precedents for guidance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>