<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 332 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247405</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that interest on the delayed refund payment of Rs. 25 lakhs should accrue from three months after the CESTAT remand order in 2002, not from the deposit date in 1998. The decision aligned with legal principles established by higher courts, emphasizing the entitlement to interest from three months after the CESTAT order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2014 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 332 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247405</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that interest on the delayed refund payment of Rs. 25 lakhs should accrue from three months after the CESTAT remand order in 2002, not from the deposit date in 1998. The decision aligned with legal principles established by higher courts, emphasizing the entitlement to interest from three months after the CESTAT order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>