<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 323 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247396</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, characterizing the income as short term capital gain and ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the treatment of expenses and penalty imposition. The judgment emphasized factors such as holding period, number of transactions, and nature of activities to determine the nature of income, highlighting the totality of circumstances in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2014 08:09:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 323 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247396</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, characterizing the income as short term capital gain and ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the treatment of expenses and penalty imposition. The judgment emphasized factors such as holding period, number of transactions, and nature of activities to determine the nature of income, highlighting the totality of circumstances in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>