<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 315 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247388</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider the cost of acquisition by factoring in the value of the flat at the time of possession, considering the significance of tenancy rights. This decision emphasized the necessity of evaluating the market value of the property at the time of possession in determining capital gains, overturning the earlier decision that relied on a minimal amount paid towards society deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2014 08:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 315 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247388</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider the cost of acquisition by factoring in the value of the flat at the time of possession, considering the significance of tenancy rights. This decision emphasized the necessity of evaluating the market value of the property at the time of possession in determining capital gains, overturning the earlier decision that relied on a minimal amount paid towards society deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>