<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Legislature Can Tax Activities Under Previous Statute Entry; Appellant Loses Tax Exemption for Non-&quot;Dam&quot; Construction.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18500</link>
    <description>A taxing entry brought to the statute book at a later stage does not mean that legislature is prevented to tax an activity in terms of a former entry embracing an activity defined by law for taxation. When the work executed by the appellant could not be held as “dam” constructed, the appellant lost exemption. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 13:28:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 13:28:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Legislature Can Tax Activities Under Previous Statute Entry; Appellant Loses Tax Exemption for Non-&quot;Dam&quot; Construction.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18500</link>
      <description>A taxing entry brought to the statute book at a later stage does not mean that legislature is prevented to tax an activity in terms of a former entry embracing an activity defined by law for taxation. When the work executed by the appellant could not be held as “dam” constructed, the appellant lost exemption. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 13:28:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>