https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165122 Coercive recovery during pendency of a statutory appeal and stay application was not finally examined on the merits; instead, the Karnataka HC directed the appellate tribunal to decide the stay request expeditiously and to advance the appeal hearing. Recovery notices issued to third parties under the VAT Act were left subject to the tribunal's further order, including whether stay should be granted unconditionally or on deposit terms. The court considered that the ends of justice were served by urgent appellate consideration rather than immediate adjudication of the recovery action. en-us Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 May 2014 11:27:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165122 Coercive recovery during pendency of a statutory appeal and stay application was not finally examined on the merits; instead, the Karnataka HC directed the appellate tribunal to decide the stay request expeditiously and to advance the appeal hearing. Recovery notices issued to third parties under the VAT Act were left subject to the tribunal's further order, including whether stay should be granted unconditionally or on deposit terms. The court considered that the ends of justice were served by urgent appellate consideration rather than immediate adjudication of the recovery action. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165122