<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1108 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165117</link>
    <description>Alternative statutory remedies ordinarily bar writ challenges to assessment orders where the governing statute provides a complete appellate mechanism and no challenge to statutory validity is raised. The assessment challenge was therefore not entertained. For amendment of an eligibility certificate, limitation under section 4A(2B) runs from communication and receipt of the BIFR order, rather than its issuance. As the application was timely on that basis, its rejection without a proper hearing, despite civil consequences, was unsustainable. The rejection was set aside and the application remanded for fresh decision after hearing the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1108 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165117</link>
      <description>Alternative statutory remedies ordinarily bar writ challenges to assessment orders where the governing statute provides a complete appellate mechanism and no challenge to statutory validity is raised. The assessment challenge was therefore not entertained. For amendment of an eligibility certificate, limitation under section 4A(2B) runs from communication and receipt of the BIFR order, rather than its issuance. As the application was timely on that basis, its rejection without a proper hearing, despite civil consequences, was unsustainable. The rejection was set aside and the application remanded for fresh decision after hearing the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>