<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1013 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165108</link>
    <description>The Haryana notification dated 19 May 1989 expressly appointed the Excise and Taxation Officer (Anti-Evasion Squad) to assist the Commissioner and authorised that officer to perform the duties of an Assessing Authority throughout the State. On that clear wording, the officer was treated as competent to make the assessment, and the objection based on lack of circle jurisdiction was rejected. The interpretation was also consistent with an earlier Division Bench view construing a similarly worded notification. The authority of the Anti-Evasion Squad officer to assess the assessee was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1013 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165108</link>
      <description>The Haryana notification dated 19 May 1989 expressly appointed the Excise and Taxation Officer (Anti-Evasion Squad) to assist the Commissioner and authorised that officer to perform the duties of an Assessing Authority throughout the State. On that clear wording, the officer was treated as competent to make the assessment, and the objection based on lack of circle jurisdiction was rejected. The interpretation was also consistent with an earlier Division Bench view construing a similarly worded notification. The authority of the Anti-Evasion Squad officer to assess the assessee was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>