<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 304 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247377</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the U.P. Trade Tax Act cannot rest on a mere change of opinion where the original assessment had already applied a 5% tax rate to the same goods and the identical issue had been examined earlier between the parties. The reasons for reopening were no different from the earlier view already taken, and no fresh material showing escaped assessment was identified. In these circumstances, the notices and authorisation for reassessment were unsustainable and were set aside, with the reassessment proceedings quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 10:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 304 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247377</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the U.P. Trade Tax Act cannot rest on a mere change of opinion where the original assessment had already applied a 5% tax rate to the same goods and the identical issue had been examined earlier between the parties. The reasons for reopening were no different from the earlier view already taken, and no fresh material showing escaped assessment was identified. In these circumstances, the notices and authorisation for reassessment were unsustainable and were set aside, with the reassessment proceedings quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>