https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247376 Writ jurisdiction was held unsuitable where the challenge to Central Sales Tax assessment orders turned on factual questions, including whether movement of goods without Form F was taxable as inter-State transactions. The Court noted that the petitioners' claims that they were not dealers and that the goods were used only for service activities required examination by the appellate authority under the statutory scheme. It therefore directed the petitioners to pursue the alternate appellate remedy under Section 18-A rather than maintain writ petitions, and dismissed the petitions with liberty to appeal. en-us Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 May 2014 11:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247376 Writ jurisdiction was held unsuitable where the challenge to Central Sales Tax assessment orders turned on factual questions, including whether movement of goods without Form F was taxable as inter-State transactions. The Court noted that the petitioners' claims that they were not dealers and that the goods were used only for service activities required examination by the appellate authority under the statutory scheme. It therefore directed the petitioners to pursue the alternate appellate remedy under Section 18-A rather than maintain writ petitions, and dismissed the petitions with liberty to appeal. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247376