<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 301 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247374</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the condonation of a 71-day delay in refiling the appeal. The appellant, in an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, disputed the pre-deposit amount set by the Tribunal for hearing the appeal. The Court directed the appellant to deposit an additional Rs. 30 lacs, in addition to the amount already deposited, for the appeal to be heard on merits by the Tribunal, setting a deadline for the deposit. Failure to comply would result in the appeal not being heard on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 301 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247374</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the condonation of a 71-day delay in refiling the appeal. The appellant, in an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, disputed the pre-deposit amount set by the Tribunal for hearing the appeal. The Court directed the appellant to deposit an additional Rs. 30 lacs, in addition to the amount already deposited, for the appeal to be heard on merits by the Tribunal, setting a deadline for the deposit. Failure to comply would result in the appeal not being heard on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>