https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247362 A fresh writ petition cannot be used to collaterally attack a final judicial order of the Supreme Court by re-labelling the challenge as habeas corpus, certiorari or mandamus; correction lies through review or curative jurisdiction. The Court's constitutional powers under Articles 129 and 142 may be used to enforce its own orders where no separate execution mechanism exists, and a complaint of natural justice fails where notice, reply and hearing were afforded. Arrest and detention may be employed as coercive enforcement measures for binding monetary directions where the contemnors have means but do not comply. Allegations of bias require a factual basis of reasonable apprehension and mere dissatisfaction is insufficient. en-us Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 May 2014 10:50:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247362 A fresh writ petition cannot be used to collaterally attack a final judicial order of the Supreme Court by re-labelling the challenge as habeas corpus, certiorari or mandamus; correction lies through review or curative jurisdiction. The Court's constitutional powers under Articles 129 and 142 may be used to enforce its own orders where no separate execution mechanism exists, and a complaint of natural justice fails where notice, reply and hearing were afforded. Arrest and detention may be employed as coercive enforcement measures for binding monetary directions where the contemnors have means but do not comply. Allegations of bias require a factual basis of reasonable apprehension and mere dissatisfaction is insufficient. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247362