<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 288 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247361</link>
    <description>Preventive detention under COFEPOSA is not invalidated by delay in passing the order if the delay is satisfactorily explained and the live link between the prejudicial activity and detention survives. Delay in serving the order also does not vitiate detention where service is effected within a reasonable time and there is no basis to infer that special execution measures were required. Non-consideration of a bail order and its conditions does not by itself invalidate detention unless the omitted material is vital and relevant to the detaining authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction. The challenge to detention therefore fails on delay, execution, and collateral material grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 14:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 288 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247361</link>
      <description>Preventive detention under COFEPOSA is not invalidated by delay in passing the order if the delay is satisfactorily explained and the live link between the prejudicial activity and detention survives. Delay in serving the order also does not vitiate detention where service is effected within a reasonable time and there is no basis to infer that special execution measures were required. Non-consideration of a bail order and its conditions does not by itself invalidate detention unless the omitted material is vital and relevant to the detaining authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction. The challenge to detention therefore fails on delay, execution, and collateral material grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>