https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247360 A woman Central Government employee was held entitled to Child Care Leave under Rule 43-C of the Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972, subject to public service exigencies. The scheme grants up to 730 days during service for care of up to two minor children, may be taken in more than one spell, and may be combined with other admissible leave. Reading sub-rules (3), (4) and (5) together, the Court held that the rule does not restrict Child Care Leave to short spells or bar a continuous period of 730 days. As no specific exigency was shown by the competent authority, the refusal of the balance leave was unsustainable. en-us Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 May 2014 10:50:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247360 A woman Central Government employee was held entitled to Child Care Leave under Rule 43-C of the Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972, subject to public service exigencies. The scheme grants up to 730 days during service for care of up to two minor children, may be taken in more than one spell, and may be combined with other admissible leave. Reading sub-rules (3), (4) and (5) together, the Court held that the rule does not restrict Child Care Leave to short spells or bar a continuous period of 730 days. As no specific exigency was shown by the competent authority, the refusal of the balance leave was unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247360