<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 285 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247358</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the books of account due to discrepancies, confirmed the income estimation at 3%, and denied separate allowance for depreciation. Interest was not separately allowed as a deduction, and previous tribunal decisions were followed for consistency. Both Revenue and assessee appeals were dismissed, aligning with established legal precedents and maintaining the income estimation and deductions as per the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 285 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247358</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the books of account due to discrepancies, confirmed the income estimation at 3%, and denied separate allowance for depreciation. Interest was not separately allowed as a deduction, and previous tribunal decisions were followed for consistency. Both Revenue and assessee appeals were dismissed, aligning with established legal precedents and maintaining the income estimation and deductions as per the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>