https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165104 Writ jurisdiction ordinarily does not interfere with a show-cause notice issued in VAT proceedings unless the notice is demonstrably without authority or ex facie without jurisdiction. Because the dealer had already replied to an earlier notice and the impugned notice continued that proceeding, the dispute whether the activity involved a taxable event under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 required factual examination by the assessing authority. The notice was therefore not treated as non est, and the petitioner was left to raise all objections before the statutory authority. en-us Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165104 Writ jurisdiction ordinarily does not interfere with a show-cause notice issued in VAT proceedings unless the notice is demonstrably without authority or ex facie without jurisdiction. Because the dealer had already replied to an earlier notice and the impugned notice continued that proceeding, the dispute whether the activity involved a taxable event under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 required factual examination by the assessing authority. The notice was therefore not treated as non est, and the petitioner was left to raise all objections before the statutory authority. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165104