<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1033 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165098</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act could not be initiated while the original assessment remained pending, because no material showed escapement of turnover. On the facts, the notice was issued only for transactions already under verification, so the statutory precondition for reassessment was absent and the proceeding was without jurisdiction. After the F forms covering stock transfers were verified and accepted, no further enquiry or reassessment could survive on the same transactions. The verified declarations satisfied the burden for exemption under the stock transfer provisions, and the assessee remained entitled to that exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1033 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165098</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act could not be initiated while the original assessment remained pending, because no material showed escapement of turnover. On the facts, the notice was issued only for transactions already under verification, so the statutory precondition for reassessment was absent and the proceeding was without jurisdiction. After the F forms covering stock transfers were verified and accepted, no further enquiry or reassessment could survive on the same transactions. The verified declarations satisfied the burden for exemption under the stock transfer provisions, and the assessee remained entitled to that exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>