https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165096 An appeal confined solely to an order as to costs was held not maintainable, since a challenge cannot lie merely against the award of costs, including under the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court also upheld recovery of costs from the Commissioner's salary, reasoning that as administrative head of the department he was responsible for compliance with the refund order and that the failure to implement it justified the cost direction. A prior appeal against the same order had already been dismissed, and the challenge to the cost recovery failed. en-us Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165096 An appeal confined solely to an order as to costs was held not maintainable, since a challenge cannot lie merely against the award of costs, including under the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court also upheld recovery of costs from the Commissioner's salary, reasoning that as administrative head of the department he was responsible for compliance with the refund order and that the failure to implement it justified the cost direction. A prior appeal against the same order had already been dismissed, and the challenge to the cost recovery failed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165096