<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (3) TMI 60 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165089</link>
    <description>Taxable treatment of encashed high denomination notes as secreted profit requires disclosed supporting material and a reasoned basis. The Tribunal accepted part of the encashed amount as business cash balances but apportioned the remainder as secreted profit without identifying evidence supporting that inference. The assessee&#039;s explanation for possessing the notes was reasonable on the available materials. A taxing finding cannot rest on an unreasoned overall impression; consequently, treating the apportioned balance as secreted profit was unsustainable, and the referred question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 17:27:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (3) TMI 60 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165089</link>
      <description>Taxable treatment of encashed high denomination notes as secreted profit requires disclosed supporting material and a reasoned basis. The Tribunal accepted part of the encashed amount as business cash balances but apportioned the remainder as secreted profit without identifying evidence supporting that inference. The assessee&#039;s explanation for possessing the notes was reasonable on the available materials. A taxing finding cannot rest on an unreasoned overall impression; consequently, treating the apportioned balance as secreted profit was unsustainable, and the referred question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>