<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1195 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165073</link>
    <description>A tax classification adopted under the Central Excise Tariff Act could not be mechanically imported into the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act to reclassify paper based decorative laminated sheets or enhance the tax rate, because the State entry had to be construed on its own language and settled administrative understanding. The later clarification was also incapable of retrospective operation, as it did not expressly apply backwards and could not be used to reopen completed assessments or sustain reassessment proceedings. The clarification and all consequential reassessment notices and orders were therefore quashed, leaving the earlier accepted rate undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1195 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165073</link>
      <description>A tax classification adopted under the Central Excise Tariff Act could not be mechanically imported into the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act to reclassify paper based decorative laminated sheets or enhance the tax rate, because the State entry had to be construed on its own language and settled administrative understanding. The later clarification was also incapable of retrospective operation, as it did not expressly apply backwards and could not be used to reopen completed assessments or sustain reassessment proceedings. The clarification and all consequential reassessment notices and orders were therefore quashed, leaving the earlier accepted rate undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>