<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1032 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165070</link>
    <description>The Tax Revision case filed by the assessee was dismissed, while the Tax Revision case filed by the State was partly allowed by modifying the Tribunal&#039;s order on certain issues. The court upheld the rejection of books of account and estimation of turnover, clarified the interpretation of section 74(2) both before and after amendment, justified the assessing officer&#039;s adoption of actual sale figures, directed uniform valuation at actual sale price, and decided against the retrospective application of Rule 38(5) due to modified additions sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1032 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165070</link>
      <description>The Tax Revision case filed by the assessee was dismissed, while the Tax Revision case filed by the State was partly allowed by modifying the Tribunal&#039;s order on certain issues. The court upheld the rejection of books of account and estimation of turnover, clarified the interpretation of section 74(2) both before and after amendment, justified the assessing officer&#039;s adoption of actual sale figures, directed uniform valuation at actual sale price, and decided against the retrospective application of Rule 38(5) due to modified additions sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>