<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 921 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165058</link>
    <description>Industrial tax incentive concessions may warrant reconsideration when a subsequent reduction in CST rates substantially undermines the deferred-tax benefit promised to the unit. The Court applied promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation to hold that a rigid refusal to modify the sales tax deferment scheme could defeat the scheme&#039;s purpose and make the concession illusory. It therefore declined to sustain the refusal order and directed reconsideration of the petitioner&#039;s request, leaving room for the State to frame appropriate ameliorative measures rather than insisting on the original form of relief alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 921 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165058</link>
      <description>Industrial tax incentive concessions may warrant reconsideration when a subsequent reduction in CST rates substantially undermines the deferred-tax benefit promised to the unit. The Court applied promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation to hold that a rigid refusal to modify the sales tax deferment scheme could defeat the scheme&#039;s purpose and make the concession illusory. It therefore declined to sustain the refusal order and directed reconsideration of the petitioner&#039;s request, leaving room for the State to frame appropriate ameliorative measures rather than insisting on the original form of relief alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>