https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165048 Concurrent factual findings that original form F declarations were later produced, verified by the assessing authority, and found to tally with the duplicates justified setting aside the revised assessment under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. The writ court declined interference because those findings were supported by the verification report and no clear error or perversity was shown. In writ jurisdiction, such concurrent findings of fact are ordinarily not disturbed absent demonstrable legal error. en-us Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 May 2014 11:23:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165048 Concurrent factual findings that original form F declarations were later produced, verified by the assessing authority, and found to tally with the duplicates justified setting aside the revised assessment under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. The writ court declined interference because those findings were supported by the verification report and no clear error or perversity was shown. In writ jurisdiction, such concurrent findings of fact are ordinarily not disturbed absent demonstrable legal error. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165048