<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 906 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165040</link>
    <description>Exchange mela transactions involving surrender of an old two-wheeler and purchase of a new vehicle were treated as purchase and sale of the old vehicle for tax purposes, because the old vehicle&#039;s value was adjusted against the new vehicle&#039;s price and the broker&#039;s role did not negate the underlying transfer. Non-disclosure of the related turnover justified penalty for suppression under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. Further reduction of penalty was available only if the petitioner proved payment of tax and interest on the old vehicle transactions; failing that, the Tribunal&#039;s reduced penalty would stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 906 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165040</link>
      <description>Exchange mela transactions involving surrender of an old two-wheeler and purchase of a new vehicle were treated as purchase and sale of the old vehicle for tax purposes, because the old vehicle&#039;s value was adjusted against the new vehicle&#039;s price and the broker&#039;s role did not negate the underlying transfer. Non-disclosure of the related turnover justified penalty for suppression under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. Further reduction of penalty was available only if the petitioner proved payment of tax and interest on the old vehicle transactions; failing that, the Tribunal&#039;s reduced penalty would stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>