https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165039 A petitioner who applied within the original incentive period under a Government grant-in-aid scheme could rely on the State's representation and the scheme conditions linked to the date of application. A later amendment reducing the promised benefit from full grant-in-aid to a lower percentage could not be applied to defeat an accrued entitlement already founded on the original order, especially where the petitioner had acted in accordance with the scheme. The text treats the matter as governed by promissory estoppel and earlier Division Bench rulings on the same scheme, with the result that the original benefit remained applicable and consequential financial relief followed if reduced aid had already been paid. en-us Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Oct 2014 19:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165039 A petitioner who applied within the original incentive period under a Government grant-in-aid scheme could rely on the State's representation and the scheme conditions linked to the date of application. A later amendment reducing the promised benefit from full grant-in-aid to a lower percentage could not be applied to defeat an accrued entitlement already founded on the original order, especially where the petitioner had acted in accordance with the scheme. The text treats the matter as governed by promissory estoppel and earlier Division Bench rulings on the same scheme, with the result that the original benefit remained applicable and consequential financial relief followed if reduced aid had already been paid. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165039