<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 247 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247320</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside and quashed the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order concerning the recall and modification of pre-deposit orders in connection with an Excise Appeal. The Court emphasized compliance with notice requirements, disagreed with a Karnataka High Court judgment on pre-deposit orders, and highlighted the Tribunal&#039;s power to modify such orders. It addressed a preliminary objection on the writ application&#039;s maintainability due to an alternative remedy of appeal but allowed the writ, directing the Tribunal to reconsider the Miscellaneous Application while leaving the pre-deposit quantum and main appeal for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 247 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247320</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside and quashed the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order concerning the recall and modification of pre-deposit orders in connection with an Excise Appeal. The Court emphasized compliance with notice requirements, disagreed with a Karnataka High Court judgment on pre-deposit orders, and highlighted the Tribunal&#039;s power to modify such orders. It addressed a preliminary objection on the writ application&#039;s maintainability due to an alternative remedy of appeal but allowed the writ, directing the Tribunal to reconsider the Miscellaneous Application while leaving the pre-deposit quantum and main appeal for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>