<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 242 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247315</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant to Rs. 10,000 and the redemption fine to Rs. 50,000, citing lack of deliberate mis-declaration intent and attributing the mistake to the supplier. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of verifying claims and circumstances before imposing penalties, underscoring the importance of fair adjudication in customs cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 242 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247315</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant to Rs. 10,000 and the redemption fine to Rs. 50,000, citing lack of deliberate mis-declaration intent and attributing the mistake to the supplier. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of verifying claims and circumstances before imposing penalties, underscoring the importance of fair adjudication in customs cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>