<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 234 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247307</link>
    <description>The Allahabad High Court analyzed the interpretation of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding deemed dividends for interest-bearing loans received by a shareholder from companies in which they held more than 10% of shares. The Court found that the Tribunal erred in its interpretation by not properly evaluating whether the loans were made in the ordinary course of business and if lending money was a substantial part of the companies&#039; business. The Court remanded the case for a fresh evaluation on whether the second condition of the exclusionary clause was satisfied, emphasizing that the appeal raised a substantial legal issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2015 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 234 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247307</link>
      <description>The Allahabad High Court analyzed the interpretation of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding deemed dividends for interest-bearing loans received by a shareholder from companies in which they held more than 10% of shares. The Court found that the Tribunal erred in its interpretation by not properly evaluating whether the loans were made in the ordinary course of business and if lending money was a substantial part of the companies&#039; business. The Court remanded the case for a fresh evaluation on whether the second condition of the exclusionary clause was satisfied, emphasizing that the appeal raised a substantial legal issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>