<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 230 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247303</link>
    <description>The court held that the respondents could proceed against the property purchased by the defaulter without affecting the property owned by the petitioner. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the Tax Officer with relevant documents within two weeks to seek appropriate remedies, and the confirmation of the sale was subject to the Tax Officer&#039;s final decision. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 230 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247303</link>
      <description>The court held that the respondents could proceed against the property purchased by the defaulter without affecting the property owned by the petitioner. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the Tax Officer with relevant documents within two weeks to seek appropriate remedies, and the confirmation of the sale was subject to the Tax Officer&#039;s final decision. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>