<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 219 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247292</link>
    <description>The court quashed the communication dated 31.12.2013 for failing to acknowledge an additional sum of Rs.35.51 lakhs as part of the tax dues. The court directed the authority to issue a fresh acknowledgment or amend the existing one to include the said amount, in addition to the already acknowledged Rs.10,24,656/-. The petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute to the specified extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 219 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247292</link>
      <description>The court quashed the communication dated 31.12.2013 for failing to acknowledge an additional sum of Rs.35.51 lakhs as part of the tax dues. The court directed the authority to issue a fresh acknowledgment or amend the existing one to include the said amount, in addition to the already acknowledged Rs.10,24,656/-. The petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute to the specified extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>