<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 774 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165014</link>
    <description>State recovery of sales tax and workmen&#039;s dues as arrears of land revenue depended on whether section 137 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 could validly be invoked to claim priority over secured creditors. The text states that, although section 47A of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 and section 33C of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 permit recovery as arrears of land revenue, State dues do not ordinarily override secured debts unless a statute expressly creates a first charge. As section 137 had earlier been declared void, it could not be used to defeat secured creditors&#039; rights or support the claimed precedence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 774 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165014</link>
      <description>State recovery of sales tax and workmen&#039;s dues as arrears of land revenue depended on whether section 137 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 could validly be invoked to claim priority over secured creditors. The text states that, although section 47A of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 and section 33C of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 permit recovery as arrears of land revenue, State dues do not ordinarily override secured debts unless a statute expressly creates a first charge. As section 137 had earlier been declared void, it could not be used to defeat secured creditors&#039; rights or support the claimed precedence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>