<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 873 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165009</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order, denying the petitioner&#039;s claim for a concessional tax rate on works contracts executed for the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB). The court determined that the notification for the concessional tax rate at four per cent applied specifically to the sale of goods to certain entities for power generation and distribution, not to goods involved in executing works contracts. Since the KSEB did not seek a concessional tax rate and the contract stated that the contractor was responsible for the full tax component, the court concluded that the petitioner&#039;s claim was not valid, resulting in the dismissal of the revision cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 873 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165009</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order, denying the petitioner&#039;s claim for a concessional tax rate on works contracts executed for the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB). The court determined that the notification for the concessional tax rate at four per cent applied specifically to the sale of goods to certain entities for power generation and distribution, not to goods involved in executing works contracts. Since the KSEB did not seek a concessional tax rate and the contract stated that the contractor was responsible for the full tax component, the court concluded that the petitioner&#039;s claim was not valid, resulting in the dismissal of the revision cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>