<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 218 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247291</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal as the appellant failed to establish an integral connection between the sale of shares and its business activities. The court agreed that the stock broker&#039;s service did not qualify as an input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appeal was dismissed without any further examination as there was no legal question necessitating review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 11:19:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 218 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247291</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal as the appellant failed to establish an integral connection between the sale of shares and its business activities. The court agreed that the stock broker&#039;s service did not qualify as an input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appeal was dismissed without any further examination as there was no legal question necessitating review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>