https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247289 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's stay petition against the Commissioner (Appeals) order, allowing the refund claim for Cenvat credit on service tax paid on input services to stand. The Tribunal relied on a Karnataka High Court decision stating no restriction on taking credit on services received before registration, emphasizing that procedural non-compliance arguments may not apply to exporters. The delay in registration was explained as following Department advice, leading to the decision in favor of the respondent. en-us Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 May 2014 11:18:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247289 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's stay petition against the Commissioner (Appeals) order, allowing the refund claim for Cenvat credit on service tax paid on input services to stand. The Tribunal relied on a Karnataka High Court decision stating no restriction on taking credit on services received before registration, emphasizing that procedural non-compliance arguments may not apply to exporters. The delay in registration was explained as following Department advice, leading to the decision in favor of the respondent. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247289