<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 215 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247288</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals and disposed of stay applications, affirming the appellants&#039; right to claim Cenvat credit for input service credit distributed by the Estate Department of the Bank, despite the department not being registered as an input service distributor. The judgment emphasized the credibility and compliance of the documents provided by the appellant, finding no reason to doubt their conduct or the authenticity of the documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 11:18:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 215 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247288</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals and disposed of stay applications, affirming the appellants&#039; right to claim Cenvat credit for input service credit distributed by the Estate Department of the Bank, despite the department not being registered as an input service distributor. The judgment emphasized the credibility and compliance of the documents provided by the appellant, finding no reason to doubt their conduct or the authenticity of the documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>