<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 212 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247285</link>
    <description>An appeal under Section 20 is barred against an order passed under Section 12-D, so that appellate remedy is unavailable where the statute expressly excludes it. A further appeal to the Appellate Tribunal under Section 22 must be filed within the prescribed sixty-day period, extendable only by a further one hundred and eighty days on sufficient cause; a challenge filed outside that window is not maintainable. Rectification under Section 22(6A) depends on a valid appeal order within the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction, so it cannot survive where the underlying appeal itself was incompetent. The statutory remedies therefore fail when pursued through barred or time-time-barred routes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 11:17:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 212 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247285</link>
      <description>An appeal under Section 20 is barred against an order passed under Section 12-D, so that appellate remedy is unavailable where the statute expressly excludes it. A further appeal to the Appellate Tribunal under Section 22 must be filed within the prescribed sixty-day period, extendable only by a further one hundred and eighty days on sufficient cause; a challenge filed outside that window is not maintainable. Rectification under Section 22(6A) depends on a valid appeal order within the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction, so it cannot survive where the underlying appeal itself was incompetent. The statutory remedies therefore fail when pursued through barred or time-time-barred routes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>