<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 211 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247284</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court clarified that for an offense under Section 10(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, mens rea is essential. The Court reduced the penalty imposed on the assessee for false representation, considering their genuine belief in compliance with the Certificate of Registration. The Court emphasized the importance of mens rea in determining penalties under the Act, ultimately reducing the penalty from 150% to 50% of the tax due.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 211 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247284</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court clarified that for an offense under Section 10(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, mens rea is essential. The Court reduced the penalty imposed on the assessee for false representation, considering their genuine belief in compliance with the Certificate of Registration. The Court emphasized the importance of mens rea in determining penalties under the Act, ultimately reducing the penalty from 150% to 50% of the tax due.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>