<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 208 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247281</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Condonation of delay in filing the appeals due to valid reasons provided by the applicants. For the stay application in the case of clandestine removal of goods, a further deposit was required, and upon compliance, the recovery of the balance amount would be stayed during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 11:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 208 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247281</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Condonation of delay in filing the appeals due to valid reasons provided by the applicants. For the stay application in the case of clandestine removal of goods, a further deposit was required, and upon compliance, the recovery of the balance amount would be stayed during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>