<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 616 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164976</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Division Bench&#039;s order granting an interim injunction. The court restored the single judge&#039;s decision to dismiss the injunction application, directing the plaintiff to address its defenses before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The plaintiff&#039;s rush to the Civil Court was deemed unjustified, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction over claims. The first defendant was awarded costs by the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 616 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164976</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Division Bench&#039;s order granting an interim injunction. The court restored the single judge&#039;s decision to dismiss the injunction application, directing the plaintiff to address its defenses before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The plaintiff&#039;s rush to the Civil Court was deemed unjustified, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction over claims. The first defendant was awarded costs by the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>