<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 200 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247273</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding a transaction between a Trust and a Private Limited Company for Assessment Year 2001-02. The Court determined that the transaction was an advance for asset acquisition, not a loan, and therefore did not violate section 13(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act. The Appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s decision was dismissed for lack of merit and without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 09:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 200 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247273</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding a transaction between a Trust and a Private Limited Company for Assessment Year 2001-02. The Court determined that the transaction was an advance for asset acquisition, not a loan, and therefore did not violate section 13(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act. The Appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s decision was dismissed for lack of merit and without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>