<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 196 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247269</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that warehousing rental charges received by the government undertaking should be classified as income from business, not income from house property. The judgment emphasized assessing the nature of activities and intentions of the appellant, aligning with established legal principles. The court found no substantial questions of law raised by the Revenue for consideration in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 196 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247269</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that warehousing rental charges received by the government undertaking should be classified as income from business, not income from house property. The judgment emphasized assessing the nature of activities and intentions of the appellant, aligning with established legal principles. The court found no substantial questions of law raised by the Revenue for consideration in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>