https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164960 A claim that an equitable mortgage and resulting charge had been created by deposit of a copy of the sale deed depended on intention and surrounding circumstances, including the letter of 2 April 1996. The Court held that such a question required pleading and proof in a civil suit and could not be decided in writ proceedings as it involved disputed questions of fact. It therefore found no infirmity in the order declining writ relief and relegating the petitioner to the civil court. en-us Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164960 A claim that an equitable mortgage and resulting charge had been created by deposit of a copy of the sale deed depended on intention and surrounding circumstances, including the letter of 2 April 1996. The Court held that such a question required pleading and proof in a civil suit and could not be decided in writ proceedings as it involved disputed questions of fact. It therefore found no infirmity in the order declining writ relief and relegating the petitioner to the civil court. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164960