<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1137 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164952</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, declaring the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s tender as illegal due to unjustified grounds regarding the sales tax clearance certificate and pledging of earnest money. It emphasized the correct interpretation of tender clauses and fair consideration of factors, including the lowest price, in awarding contracts. The authorities were directed to reconsider the petitioner&#039;s offer accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1137 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164952</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, declaring the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s tender as illegal due to unjustified grounds regarding the sales tax clearance certificate and pledging of earnest money. It emphasized the correct interpretation of tender clauses and fair consideration of factors, including the lowest price, in awarding contracts. The authorities were directed to reconsider the petitioner&#039;s offer accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>