<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 956 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164946</link>
    <description>Rule 39(5)(iv) of the KVAT Rules requires a single best judgment assessment only when the assessment process is initiated after the expiry of the relevant year and covers more than one return period; where audit assessment proceedings were begun during the financial year and were already in progress before year-end, separate monthly assessments were permissible. A turnover estimate based on inspection material showing the actual business mix was treated as a factual finding, and the appellate estimate was found reasonable. No substantial question of law arose in revision, so the modified assessment orders were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 956 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164946</link>
      <description>Rule 39(5)(iv) of the KVAT Rules requires a single best judgment assessment only when the assessment process is initiated after the expiry of the relevant year and covers more than one return period; where audit assessment proceedings were begun during the financial year and were already in progress before year-end, separate monthly assessments were permissible. A turnover estimate based on inspection material showing the actual business mix was treated as a factual finding, and the appellate estimate was found reasonable. No substantial question of law arose in revision, so the modified assessment orders were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>