<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1260 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164932</link>
    <description>The court upheld the revisional authority&#039;s decision to apply the general tax rate to the sale of parched groundnuts, considering them as distinct commodities from groundnuts. The judgment emphasized the legal difference between the two and dismissed the petitioner&#039;s argument based on a different ruling in a separate case. The petition challenging the assessment order was ultimately dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1260 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164932</link>
      <description>The court upheld the revisional authority&#039;s decision to apply the general tax rate to the sale of parched groundnuts, considering them as distinct commodities from groundnuts. The judgment emphasized the legal difference between the two and dismissed the petitioner&#039;s argument based on a different ruling in a separate case. The petition challenging the assessment order was ultimately dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>